aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/test/SemaCXX/cxx11-inheriting-ctors.cpp
blob: 7d6f4f09f09c473509f72accc344c791cb3128b1 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -verify

namespace PR15757 {
  struct S {
  };

  template<typename X, typename Y> struct T {
    template<typename A> T(X x, A &&a) {}

    template<typename A> explicit T(A &&a)
        noexcept(noexcept(T(X(), static_cast<A &&>(a))))
      : T(X(), static_cast<A &&>(a)) {}
  };

  template<typename X, typename Y> struct U : T<X, Y> {
    using T<X, Y>::T;
  };

  U<S, char> foo(char ch) { return U<S, char>(ch); }

  int main() {
    U<S, int> a(42);
    U<S, char> b('4');
    return 0;
  }
}

namespace WrongIdent {
  struct A {};
  struct B : A {};
  struct C : B {
    using B::A;
  };
}

namespace DefaultCtorConflict {
  struct A { A(int = 0); };
  struct B : A {
    using A::A;
  } b; // ok, not ambiguous, inherited constructor suppresses implicit default constructor
  struct C {
    B b;
  } c;
}

namespace InvalidConstruction {
  struct A { A(int); };
  struct B { B() = delete; };
  struct C : A, B { using A::A; };
  // Initialization here is performed as if by a defaulted default constructor,
  // which would be ill-formed (in the immediate context) in this case because
  // it would be defined as deleted.
  template<typename T> void f(decltype(T(0))*);
  template<typename T> int &f(...);
  int &r = f<C>(0);
}

namespace ExplicitConv {
  struct B {};
  struct D : B { // expected-note 3{{candidate}}
    using B::B;
  };
  struct X { explicit operator B(); } x;
  struct Y { explicit operator D(); } y;

  D dx(x); // expected-error {{no matching constructor}}
  D dy(y);
}

namespace NestedListInit {
  struct B { B(); } b; // expected-note 3{{candidate}}
  struct D : B { // expected-note 14{{not viable}}
    using B::B;
  };
  // This is a bit weird. We're allowed one pair of braces for overload
  // resolution, and one more pair of braces due to [over.ics.list]/2.
  B b1 = {b};
  B b2 = {{b}};
  B b3 = {{{b}}}; // expected-error {{no match}}
  // Per a proposed defect resolution, we don't get to call
  // D's version of B::B(const B&) here.
  D d0 = b; // expected-error {{no viable conversion}}
  D d1 = {b}; // expected-error {{no match}}
  D d2 = {{b}}; // expected-error {{no match}}
  D d3 = {{{b}}}; // expected-error {{no match}}
  D d4 = {{{{b}}}}; // expected-error {{no match}}
}

namespace PR31606 {
  // PR31606: as part of a proposed defect resolution, do not consider
  // inherited constructors that would be copy constructors for any class
  // between the declaring class and the constructed class (inclusive).
  struct Base {};

  struct A : Base {
    using Base::Base;
    bool operator==(A const &) const; // expected-note {{no known conversion from 'PR31606::B' to 'const PR31606::A' for 1st argument}}
  };

  struct B : Base {
    using Base::Base;
  };

  bool a = A{} == A{};
  // Note, we do *not* allow operator=='s argument to use the inherited A::A(Base&&) constructor to construct from B{}.
  bool b = A{} == B{}; // expected-error {{invalid operands}}
}

namespace implicit_member_srcloc {
  template<class T>
  struct S3 {
  };

  template<class T>
  struct S2 {
    S2(S3<T> &&);
  };

  template<class T>
  struct S1 : S2<T> {
    using S2<T>::S2;
    S1();
  };

  template<class T>
  struct S0 {
    S0();
    S0(S0&&) = default;
    S1<T> m1;
  };

  void foo1() {
    S0<int> s0;
  }
}